📖
Typo Help Docs
  • Welcome
  • Getting Started
    • Onboarding
    • Integrations
      • Git
        • GitHub
        • GitLab
        • BitBucket
        • Azure Repos
        • Gitlab On-prem
      • Issue Tracker
        • JIRA
        • Linear
        • GitHub Issue
        • Shortcut
        • ClickUp
      • CI/CD Tool
        • Circle CI
        • Jenkins
        • Heroku
        • GitHub Actions
        • Azure DevOps
        • Custom Deployment Webhook
      • Slack
    • How Requestly setup Typo in a few days
  • Platform
    • Dev Analytics
      • DORA
      • Insights
        • Teams
        • Members
        • Sprints
        • Pull Requests
        • Deployments
      • Incident
      • Goals
      • Investment
      • Initiative
      • WorkLog
      • Custom Reports
      • Settings
        • Teams
        • Member
        • Repository
        • Projects
        • Manage Access
        • Notifications
    • Code Health
      • Code Review
      • Code Coverage
    • DevEx
  • Implementation Plan
    • Phase 1 - Setting Up Data Sources
    • Phase 2 - Metric Configuration
      • Dev360
      • Code Health
      • DevEx
    • Phase 3 - Team Rollout
  • Engineering Metrics
    • DORA
      • Cycle Time
      • Deployment PRs
      • Change Failure Rate
      • Mean Time to Restore
    • Pull Request Metrics
      • Avg. Commits During PR Review
      • Coding Days
      • Coding Time
      • Merge frequency
      • Merge Time
      • Pickup Time
      • PR Size
      • PRs Merged without Review
      • Review Time
      • Efficiency Score
    • Sprint Metrics
      • Carry over
      • Developer Workload
      • Issue Cycle Time
      • Issues At-Risk
      • Scope creep
      • Team Velocity
      • Work Breakup
      • Work Progress
    • Code Quality Metrics
      • OWASP Top 10
      • Vulnerability
      • Security
      • Performance
      • Duplication
      • Code Smell
    • Deployment Metrics
      • Deployment - Failure
      • Deployment - Frequency
      • Time to Build
    • Incident Metrics
      • Incident - Opened
      • Avg Resolution Time
    • DevEx Metrics
      • DevEx Score
      • Space mood
      • Response Rate
      • Manager Support
      • Developer Flow
      • Product Management
      • Development & Releases
      • Culture & Values
  • Configurations
    • Cycle Time
    • Deployment PRs
    • Change Failure Rate (CFR)
    • Mean Time To Restore (MTTR)
    • CI/CD - Deployment
    • Incident
    • Initiative
    • Investment Distribution
    • PR Labels
    • Code Health
    • Code Coverage
    • DevEx
    • Notifications
    • Manage Access
  • FAQ's
    • Data Security
      • GitHub App Permissions Details
      • Why does Typo need write permission to my code?
      • Does Typo has access to my code?
      • What data security guidelines does Typo follow?
    • Integrations
      • Can Typo application work with on-prem Gitlab?
      • How do I get Issue Tracker data?
      • How do I get Git data?
    • Pricing
      • How does the pricing work?
      • How do I upgrade my plan?
    • Access Management
      • My team member is not able to login to Typo
    • Metrics
      • How does Typo predict developer burnout?
      • Is there a way to change the branch that Deployment PRs are measured against?
      • Synchronize “CFR” & “MTTR” without incident management?
      • How quick does the pull-request page update? I closed a PR but the Typo still shows Awaiting Review
      • How do I add any new repo?
      • How to Configure Typo Code Health Checks to Block a PR Merge in Git
      • Can I exclude a person from metrics calculation?
      • Can I track the Cycle time based on the status of the JIRA tickets?
      • How do I unlink the JIRA tracker & integrate Linear?
      • How to exclude a PR from any metric calculation?
      • My data is not visible, I have synced the repo
    • Platform
      • Can I use your application on-premise?
    • Delete Account
      • How can I delete my account?
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Engineering Metrics
  2. Pull Request Metrics

Avg. Commits During PR Review

PreviousPull Request MetricsNextCoding Days

Last updated 9 months ago

This represents the average number of commits made to each Pull Request after it is raised for review. It is an indicative measure of the quality of code & code reviews.

The average number of commits made to each Pull Request after it is raised for review. It is an indicative measure of the quality of code & code reviews.

Typo records the number of commits made to each Pull Request after they were raised for review. To calculate the final average, the total number of such commits is divided by the total number of Pull Requests raised for review within the selected time range.

Benchmarking average commits after PR is raised provides valuable insights into code quality, code review processes, and developer productivity, enabling engineering teams to identify areas for improvement and drive efficiency gains in software development.

How does measuring average commits after PR is raised help in improving the Engineering teams' efficiency?

Measuring the average number of commits after a Pull Request (PR) is raised provides valuable insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of the engineering team's development process. Here's how it helps in improving efficiency:

  1. Identifying Code Quality Issues: A higher average number of commits after PRs may indicate code quality issues, such as incomplete or incorrect implementations.

  2. Optimizing Code Review Processes: Monitoring the average number of commits helps teams assess the effectiveness of their code review processes. A higher number of commits could suggest that code reviews are not thorough enough or that developers are not adequately addressing feedback before merging their changes.

  3. Reducing Iteration Cycles: High iteration cycles, indicated by a high average number of commits per PR, can lead to delays in the development process.

  4. Improving Developer Collaboration: Tracking the average number of commits fosters collaboration among team members by highlighting areas where developers may need additional support or guidance.