PRs Merged without Review
Pull Request merged without review refers to all those pull requests that are merged without the review being approved.
For all the merged PRs, Typo considers the ones that do not have any ‘Approved’ status associated with them. In case of merged PRs having review comments but not approval, such Pull Requests are also considered as merged without review.
Benchmarking PRs merged without review helps engineering teams identify potential gaps in their code review processes and ensure code quality standards are upheld. By tracking this metric, teams can quantify the extent of unreviewed code changes, which may lead to increased technical debt, bugs, and regressions.
How does measuring Pull Request merged without review help in improving the Engineering teams' efficiency?
Maintaining Code Quality: Monitoring PRs merged without review helps ensure that all code changes are scrutinized before integration. By reducing the number of PRs merged without review, teams can maintain higher standards of code quality and reduce the likelihood of introducing bugs or errors into the codebase.
Promoting Collaboration: Encouraging the review process fosters collaboration among team members. Reviewing PRs by peers provides an opportunity for knowledge sharing, feedback, and constructive discussions. This collaborative environment ultimately leads to better solutions, increased code understanding, and improved team cohesion.
Mitigating Risks: Unreviewed PRs pose risks to the stability and reliability of the software. By measuring and minimizing the occurrence of PRs merged without review, teams can mitigate these risks and enhance the overall robustness of the codebase. This proactive approach helps prevent potential issues from impacting users and ensures smoother project delivery.
Enhancing Accountability: Implementing a review process ensures that all code changes are accountable to team members. By measuring PRs merged without review, teams can identify any lapses in accountability and address them accordingly. This promotes a culture of responsibility and transparency within the team, leading to better governance and project management.
Continuous Improvement: Regularly tracking PRs merged without review allows teams to evaluate their review processes and identify areas for improvement. By analyzing trends and patterns, teams can implement strategies to streamline the review process, address bottlenecks, and optimize workflow efficiency. This continuous improvement cycle fosters a culture of learning and adaptation, driving long-term productivity and success.
Last updated
